ADS Initiative
Get Involved
Open Standard · Apache 2.0 · Free Forever

Every student achievement in India.
One open data language.

ADS is India's open specification for student achievement — defining how every event is recorded, what fields it contains, and how data flows between schools, universities, and regulatory bodies. Built to bring structural order to the system and make a step-change in data interoperability, talent visibility, and efficiency on all sides.

The Problem

Every major education system in India has a gap in the same place.

UDISE+, APAAR, DigiLocker, and six state EMIS systems together track 26 crore students. None of them record extracurricular achievement. This isn't a flaw in their design — it's a boundary that has never been drawn across, at any level, in any system. Without a shared standard for this layer, achievement records cannot be machine-readable, consistent, or portable across institutions.

0

open data standards
exist for this layer.

Not in Ed-Fi, 1EdTech, NDEAR, or any comparable body.

System What it covers What it doesn't
UDISE+School identity, enrollment, welfare scheme coverage, teacher countsStudent achievement — outside its administrative brief
APAAR / ABCNational student ID, higher education creditsCo-curricular records — referenced in policy, not yet implemented in the published spec
DigiLocker / NADBoard certificates issued by recognised institutionsRecord generation — designed to store credentials that already exist, not originate new ones
SATS (Karnataka)Enrollment, CCE academic results, transfer certificatesExtracurricular achievement
SARAL (Maharashtra)1.07 lakh schools, marksheets, dropout trackingExtracurricular achievement
EMIS (Tamil Nadu)Enrollment, academic performance, attendanceExtracurricular achievement
Sampoorna (Kerala)Enrollment, exam scheduling, academic report generationExtracurricular — including from Kalolsavam, one of India's most extensive school competition programmes
VSK (Gujarat)Real-time attendance, enrollment, teacher deploymentExtracurricular achievement

Based on publicly available documentation. Not a criticism — each was built to solve a different problem.

The Standard

Two open standards. One shared language.

ADS is not a platform. It is a specification — a common technical language that any school system can implement, any government portal can adopt, and any university can read.

Data Interoperability

Machine-readable outputs for every event

A primary goal of ADS is to significantly improve data interoperability within India's higher-education ecosystem and the institutions that rely on its outputs. Every school and university-level event — academic or non-academic — should produce a structured, machine-readable record that any downstream system can consume without manual reinterpretation: admissions portals, scholarship platforms, APAAR, state EMIS, or university systems. ADS defines that record.

Source of Truth

Consistent data from field to field, institution to institution

ADS resolves source-of-truth problems that accumulate without a shared vocabulary: inconsistent field definitions across application forms, incompatible data-capture formats for identical event types, and records that cannot be matched against the data vocabularies maintained by the regulatory bodies governing those events. Every term in the standard traces to a recognised authority — ensuring that what one system calls an event, every system calls the same thing.

Layer 1 v0.1 Draft

Non-Academic Achievement Standard

Defines how schools record sports, arts, and debate results — with controlled vocabularies traced to World Athletics, FIDE, Sangeet Natak Akademi, and other governing bodies.

Layer 2 In preparation

Exchange Standard

Maps records from UDISE+, APAAR, DigiLocker, and state EMIS systems into portable W3C Verifiable Credentials. Designed as the content layer for NDEAR's academic achievement building block.

Repository opening soon — subscribe to be notified

NEP 2020 Section 4.36 mandates Holistic Progress Cards that include extracurricular achievement for every student. No government-provided technical specification exists for how to do this. ADS is that specification.

Open Standard (ADS)

  • +Any system can implement — no vendor lock-in
  • +Government can mandate without owning
  • +Works for a rural government school and a national federation equally
  • +Outlives any single organisation

Centralised Portal

  • Creates vendor dependency
  • High adoption barrier for under-resourced schools
  • Innovation locked to a single provider
  • Single point of failure at scale

Design Principles

Seven tests every decision must pass.

Click any principle to read the full definition.

The standard must work for a Class 6 student at a government school in rural Bihar as well as a national-level athlete in Bangalore. Every field, vocabulary term, and conduct guide must ask: does this leave anyone out?
The record belongs to the student. ADS exists to amplify their voice and open doors — not to create data assets for platforms or institutions. Ask of every contribution: does this serve the student, or the system?
Every conduct guide must include a minimum viable path — how a school with no trained judges, no equipment, and limited connectivity can still run the activity and produce a valid record.
Every definition traces back to a recognised body — World Athletics, FIDE, Sangeet Natak Akademi, WSDC. Contributors document what already exists; they do not invent. Where no authority exists, provenance must be stated.
Capture only what is needed for recognition and portability. If a field cannot be justified by a downstream use — admissions, scholarship evaluation, talent discovery — it should not be in the standard.
Consent, pseudonymisation, and data minimisation are structural — not optional add-ons for implementations to configure later. The default is always the most privacy-preserving option.
Specialists define the ceiling — governing bodies set competition-grade definitions at the highest level of precision. The community lowers the floor — adapting those definitions so a school with no specialist coaches can still participate and have that participation recorded meaningfully.

Activity Taxonomy v0.1

43 activities. One shared language.

Every activity name, classification, and result type is traced to an authoritative institutional source. No ambiguity about what counts or how it's categorised.

31

Sport

T&F · Team · Racket · Mind

10

Cultural

Debate · Literary · Arts

3

Research

Conduct guide soon

Civic

In development

[WA] World Athletics [SGFI] School Games Federation of India [FIDE] World Chess Federation [WSDC] World Schools Debating Championships [SA] Sahitya Akademi [SNA] Sangeet Natak Akademi
Sport

Track & Field

WA SGFI

Team Games

SGFI

Racket Sports

SGFI

Mind Sports

FIDE

Style: Classical · Rapid · Blitz · Bullet

Cultural

Debate & Public Speaking

WSDC

Literary Arts

SA

↳ Student IP rights apply

Visual & Performing Arts

SNA
This is a living document. Research & Innovation and Civic & Leadership domains are in active development. Activity additions are reviewed on a 6-month cycle aligned to academic years. Subscribe to updates.

Stay Updated

Get notified when the standard evolves

New activities, updated conduct guides, schema changes. Not often. Only when it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe any time.

Get involved

Two standards under active development. Contributions welcome from educators, sport federation representatives, cultural practitioners, schema developers, and anyone who has organised a school event.

Not yet constituted Invite-only

The Standards Development Committee is the governance body responsible for ratifying vocabulary changes, approving new activity domains, and maintaining the integrity of the standard over time. It has a three-tier structure: a Governing Board, Domain Working Groups, and a Technical Council.

View the SDC page